![]() The second-placed Hitachi VSP G1000 is an HA setup.ĭataCore thinks its "new results are sure to send a wake-up call to a storage community obsessed with debating how to speed up latency-sensitive applications." ![]() ![]() These weren't even totally all-flash systems.Ī 2TB 5,400rpm SATA disk drive was the system disk drive for one system it was a 500GB SATA SSD for the other server.ĭataCore's Eric Wendel, Director, Technical Ecosystems Development, says the top scorer, a Huawei system, is not an HA configuration. The storage in each was 18 x 240GB 6Gbit/s Samsung SATA SSDs and 4 x 300GB 12Gbit/s HGST SAS disk drives. These were synchronously mirrored using 16Gbit/s FC. They ran Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise Server w/SP1. Each had 2 x Xeon 2.3GHz E5-2696 v3 processors with 18 cores and 45MB Intel Smart Cache, with 758GB of main memory. DataCore's configuration used a fully redundant, dual-node Fibre Channel Server SAN configuration running its SANsymphony storage software on a pair of off-the-shelf Intel-based servers, two Lenovo x3650 servers. ![]() Among other top-scoring systems costing more than a million dollars, the DataCore ones stand out for costing less than $150,000, a tenth or more less than Huawei and Hitachi arrays.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |